OK, so here's what I think the Dems should do on this gay marriage amendment, and the attempts to place the Defense of Marriage Act outside normal judicial review. Let's beat them at their own game. Add a couple of amendments to the legislation. Say, "you're really serious about defending the instiution of marriage? How could you say no to this?"
| Marriage | Law |
And ... you could combine it with this news story, about people finding out that they're officially married to people they've never met.
"South African women have been urged to check regularly at their local registry offices, to see whether they have been married without their
knowledge."
maybe two strikes, you can't step to the plate for the third time.
Oh, but how about the other parts, like a man not marrying his brother's widow. Shouldn't we do something about that?
Comment #2 :: link :: July 27, 2004 02:00 AMHeck, as long as the Religious Wrong is going to be involved, let’s take this all! the! way! back to the Good Book and flippin’ *require* that the man has to marry his brother’s widow, and al that jazz.
Comment #3 :: link :: July 27, 2004 10:13 PMLet's see Newt Gingrich get behind these proposals.
Comment #4 :: link :: July 28, 2004 10:43 AM
