Phat(ic) Communications

OK, so I'm on Facebook. I can now Pownce. I've never Twittered.

But I don't really get it. I suppose I'm old and crotchety and set in my ways by now -- if people want to tell me something, why don't they just blog? Or email? Or IM? What's this hybrid -- thing?

I suppose I would have gotten it earlier had I read Grant's piece on How social networks work:

Jerry Michalski and Pip Coburn were recently talking about the puzzle of "exhaust data." These are data that pass between friends on Facebook and Twitter...as when someone tells me they're doing their nails, or I tell them I'm entertaining my cat.

Who on earth cares? What kind of communication is this? Can it be that we are using the internet to issue trivial facts about ourselves? Facts? The "fact" that I am entertaining the cat is so staggeringly unimportant it fails to interest even the cat.

But there is another, anthropological, point of view. Exhaust data is, I think, a clear case of "phatic communication." This is communication with little hard, informational content, but lots of emotional and social content. Phatic communications doesn't get much said, but it has social effects so powerful, it gets lots done.

So basically:

10 PRINT "Hello World"
20 GOTO 10


M E-L posted this on September 06, 2007
It is filed under Computers & Internet

It is also indexed with the following tags: Facebook | Pownce | Twitter | Social Software | Social Networking | Distributed Culture |

Comments
Tk wrote:

Not so much with the BASIC analogy. You're just witnessing the conversion of meatspace to cyberspace. When phones became cheap enough, teenage girls started (stereotypically, at least) talking about "nothing" on them all the time. (I'm sure boys did something similar, but nothing on personal media springs to mind.) One difference now is that people do it in public. But they also have since cell phones became cheap enough. We've all been next to people whose entire half of the conversation we were subjected to. I do Twitter, though I don't do much with my Facebook or LinkedIn accounts. Twitter allows me to read that a colleague at UC Irvine is getting new lab furniture and to ask her where she's getting it from. And her to tell me where, and end of conversation. Just like we were sitting two cubicles away. Some of the Facebook and MySpace stuff is the same but asynchronous (as IM and Twitter can be, too). It's almost the equivalent of the whiteboard on your college room door. (In fact, the experience is probably intentionally similar.)

The programming analogy might be more that everyone's first program in a new language is "Hello, World!".

Comment #1 :: link :: September 7, 2007 10:14 PM
Ennis wrote:

It's like people who greet each other with "Yo" or "How you doin'?" Yo doesn't add anything, and how you doin doesn't mean they want to know. It's a ritual call and response. Trip is right, those same meatspace communication routines are bleeding into cyberspace except that facebook and twitter are more informative.

Comment #2 :: link :: September 9, 2007 04:43 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?




Enter the following security code to prove that you are human:





Note: HTML is allowed in your comment. Please be patient as posting can take up to a minute depending on traffic. If you're planning on spamming, don't bother; URLs in comments will not be indexed by any search engine.


















Ishbadiddle buttonTriptronix buttonMovable Type buttonMT Plugins buttonCreative Commons buttonCSS Tableless buttonEdit Pad buttonMax Design buttonLogin buttonEmail button

1m blogsageless buttonNYC Blogger buttonGeoURL buttonBlogdex buttonBlogShares buttonBlogstreet buttonEatonweb buttonTechnorati button

DonorsChoose buttonFlying Spaghetti MonsterGet Firefox!Stand up for your rightsWin With Blingo!

Ishbadiddle Full Posts Feed ButtonIshbadiddle Posts Excerpts Feed ButtonBloglines subscribe buttonIshbadiddle LiveJournal Feed Button